Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Loss_region unable to converge #11

Closed
lu-ming-lei opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Loss_region unable to converge #11

lu-ming-lei opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@lu-ming-lei
Copy link

1
Other Loss has significant decline, but Loss_region‘s drop is very weak. My training use config : configs/gdrn/lm/a6_cPnP_lm13.py
Region area choose 4, 16, 64 can not make any improve.

@wangg12
Copy link
Member

wangg12 commented Jun 22, 2021

How is your test performance?

@lu-ming-lei
Copy link
Author

The performanceis similar to your result

@lu-ming-lei
Copy link
Author

As shown in Paper, without using Loss_region can still work well, but I wonder why it is hard to estimate this part. I think estimate crop_xyz is a harder task and it can work.

@wangg12
Copy link
Member

wangg12 commented Jun 22, 2021

As shown in Paper, without using Loss_region can still work well, but I wonder why it is hard to estimate this part. I think estimate crop_xyz is a harder task and it can work.

Loss region can be regarded as a regularizer or auxiliary task for learning the symmetries and the coarse region information. To estimate a 6D pose, we only need the correspondences, so the network might pay more attention to optimize towards the xyz part rather than the regions. Besides, when doing the class-agnostic training, the learning of regions might be much harder.

@lu-ming-lei
Copy link
Author

thanks for your explanation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants