Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The datasets are not convincing enough #9

Open
nixror opened this issue Jun 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

The datasets are not convincing enough #9

nixror opened this issue Jun 6, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@nixror
Copy link

nixror commented Jun 6, 2021

I wonder if you can add an OGB experiment result?
I tried to run GRAND on the ogbn-arXiv dataset, but the result was very bad.

@wzfhaha
Copy link
Collaborator

wzfhaha commented Jun 8, 2021

I wonder if you can add an OGB experiment result?
I tried to run GRAND on the ogbn-arXiv dataset, but the result was very bad.

Thanks for your interests! We don't use OGB because GRAND is mainly for semi-supervised node classification, where labeled nodes are limited. The ogbn-arXiv has enough labels, in that setting consistency regularization might be not useful and even degrade the performance. You can try to remove consistency loss when running OGB, and to see if the results will become better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants