Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible to replace PoseNet by the groudtruth pose extracted from IMU #39

Closed
flamehaze1115 opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@flamehaze1115
Copy link

Thanks for such excellent work! I notice that you extract camera pose from IMU and just use translation in velocity loss. Is it possible to replace the PoseNet by the camera pose from IMU?

@ymaocdc
Copy link

ymaocdc commented Jun 29, 2020

I have the same question as @flamehaze1115
The question is more likely to be how PoseNet influence the final results. If we use the GT pose during training, will we get better depth prediction? I have not read from any paper to my knowledge about the ablation study on this part. If anyone can point out where I should look at, that will be great.

@VitorGuizilini-TRI
Copy link
Collaborator

@flamehaze1115 It is definitely possible (replace PoseNet with GT pose), we have experimented with it in the past. Interestingly, we did not see significant improvement when using GT pose compared to learned pose, but as @ymaocdc said, I don't think there have been many papers with such ablation study.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants