Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QM9 dataset #3

Closed
smiles724 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

QM9 dataset #3

smiles724 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@smiles724
Copy link

Hi, I notice you implemented experiments in extensive datasets. However, most of your baseline models show their performance in the popular QM9 dataset. Can you please provide this sort of information so that we can have a more clear understanding of how well your model is? Thanks.

@gasteigerjo
Copy link
Contributor

gasteigerjo commented Dec 2, 2021

GemNet focuses on molecular dynamics and force predictions, not on other molecular properties. QM9 only contains equilibrium configurations, on which force predictions wouldn't make any sense (all forces are 0).

But please do feel free to run tests. The project structure is rather similar to DimeNet's code, so you could use some stuff from the data container there. I wouldn't expect any substantial improvements out of the box. But with some hyperparameter tuning you might achieve something.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants