You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
#1264, #491 #1225 seem like one basic GET. We can request them with ?name = "" and ?address = "". Internally, we should use a LIKE (Postgres) operator for address Strings.
In addition to the latter. Two nice GET meth. would be a simple Boolean response for an open specified location. with ?time = t::TIMESTAMP
/** @param loc = User.aroundUser() would be called by the client if no location is specified* @param time = now() is also called from client // we may change that I am not sure which is faster right now/fun locationIsOpen(loc:Location, time:TIME= now()): Booleanfun IsOpen(time:Time= now()): Collection<Location>() // I don't even care if we use a HashMap :)if you're familiar with Higher Kinded Types we can use a Kinds<Container, Location>
Proposal for API methods
#1264, #491 #1225 seem like one basic GET. We can request them with ?name = "" and ?address = "". Internally, we should use a LIKE (Postgres) operator for address Strings.
In addition to the latter. Two nice GET meth. would be a simple Boolean response for an open specified location. with ?time = t::TIMESTAMP
Can be messy, but I found an almost easy solution. We Pattern Match over the search string and output max. 3 columns with the highest resemblance.
One PUT/ POST for the Crawler without specifying the Id
One PATCH for Users and the Crawler
Feature Issue: Users can Up/Down Vote the correctness of opening hours so we can debug
Feature Issue: Users can suggest not indexed Locations (only TUM) specifying a name and address
Why do they matter ?
missing information
I am open for suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: