Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] I would like to be able to filter search results by video quality #1396

Closed
OpenPurpleMango opened this issue May 13, 2018 · 13 comments

Comments

@OpenPurpleMango
Copy link

OpenPurpleMango commented May 13, 2018

Hi everyone.

Something that has been bothering me about NewPipe for a while is that I cannot filter the searg results by video quality. It can get annoying because I might be looking for a 1080p clip, but most of the clips that show up are 360p.

I noticed that the other foss YouTube apps don't have this, so adding this feature would help NewPipe to stand out.

@OpenPurpleMango OpenPurpleMango changed the title I would like to be able to filter search results by video quality [Feature Request ]I would like to be able to filter search results by video quality May 13, 2018
@OpenPurpleMango OpenPurpleMango changed the title [Feature Request ]I would like to be able to filter search results by video quality [Feature Request] I would like to be able to filter search results by video quality May 13, 2018
@theScrabi
Copy link
Member

The question is would such a sort be supported by newpipe?

@Hashik-Donthineni
Copy link
Contributor

He is asking for a feature I believe, a "filter" feature in which if 1080P is selected, only videos having 1080P resolution(and above) will show up.

@theScrabi
Copy link
Member

The question is would such a sort be supported by newpipe?

I ment youtube.

The question is would such a sort be supported by youtube?

I talk and mention NewPipe so often that i sometimes mix up NewPipe with youtube.

@Hashik-Donthineni
Copy link
Contributor

Hashik-Donthineni commented May 17, 2018

Yup, it does and the best thing is there this assignment "sp=EgIgAQ%253D%253D" is added along with the query when you select the HD filter along with the query string.
Here check this out, look at all the filters

Yesterday, I tried understanding how the search work for 15min didn't understand I think It's easy to add these because the URL is changing with the filter. Yesterday is the first time I cloned and ran the app in the emulator, I am kinda novice dev in Android good with Java tho, hopefully, someday I will be of use to this app :) looking forward to contributing...

@theScrabi
Copy link
Member

Ok than it can be done. I actually work on a feature for backend right now that would allow more detailed filtering/sorting.

@Hashik-Donthineni
Copy link
Contributor

Can you turn newpipe extractor into RESTful API? If you do that it can be used for both Android, Desktop if people are willing to build, also maybe for Flutter app who knows...

@theScrabi
Copy link
Member

I want to, but please discuse this at another tread.

@Hashik-Donthineni
Copy link
Contributor

Ow, sorry about that.

@OpenPurpleMango
Copy link
Author

@theScrabi Do you think that you can add this feature to the next release? I really want NewPipe to have this feature.

@theScrabi
Copy link
Member

@StarTrekRocks73 I am currently working on supporting further sorting, but it will definitely take some time until we can sea the first advantages of it.

@Hashik-Donthineni
Copy link
Contributor

Idk about HD but sorting according to time and sort by upload date/time is a damn useful feature. It is a must have and many people use it.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 1, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 1, 2018
@TobiGr TobiGr removed the stale label Jul 19, 2019
@Stypox
Copy link
Member

Stypox commented Aug 18, 2019

Closing in favour of #2251 #110 and TeamNewPipe/NewPipeExtractor#124

@Stypox Stypox closed this as completed Aug 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants