Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Invalid field entry" with index over 9 #30

Closed
runely opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

"Invalid field entry" with index over 9 #30

runely opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@runely
Copy link
Contributor

runely commented Nov 25, 2021

Can not add Key or Code with index higher than 9!

1-9 is working okey, but from 10 and up i get Invalid field entry.

I have a tag added as slot nr 1 on the IDLock lock. This tag is presented as tag 26 in IDLock app (from Who). And when i cant add indexes over 9 i cant map them to a user in the app...

IDLock app version: 1.2.3
Homey version: 7.1.6
IDLock firmware: 1.5.9

image

image

@runely runely changed the title "Invalid field entry" with index over 10 "Invalid field entry" with index over 9 Dec 6, 2021
@joco73
Copy link
Contributor

joco73 commented Jan 28, 2022

@runely I have updated my fork so it should work.
Info is that settings/index.html
had code like this:
<span editable-number="code.index" e-name="index" e-form="rowform" e-min="1" e-max="9" onbeforesave="checkNotEmpty($data)" e-required> {{ code.index }} </span>

I have updated to this:
<span editable-number="code.index" e-name="index" e-form="rowform" e-min="1" e-max="99" onbeforesave="checkNotEmpty($data)" e-required> {{ code.index }} </span>

Note the value of e-max.

@runely
Copy link
Contributor Author

runely commented Jan 28, 2022

THANK YOU SO MUCH @joco73 👏

This works like a charm!

@Fotofantasten
Copy link

@TedTolboom

I installed the latest version today (1.2.3) after reciving my IDLock 150 yesterday and I get the same issue as the thread creator. Is there going to be an update in the app that solves the issue?

Best regards
Richard

@TedTolboom
Copy link
Owner

Resolved in v2.0.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants