Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFE] Cluster name / unique identifier is unwieldy #582

Closed
julienlim opened this issue Sep 8, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

[RFE] Cluster name / unique identifier is unwieldy #582

julienlim opened this issue Sep 8, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@julienlim
Copy link
Member

The clusters that get imported have very long unique identifiers that get truncated in the UI, e.g. in the context switcher and all places where the cluster name is displayed.

Is it possible to come up with a more user-friendly unique identifier that gets auto-created or auto-assigned? E.g. YYMMDDHHMM (and maybe leave of the prefix "Gluster-" which takes up 8 letters). To address leaving of the "Gluster-" prefix, let's add it to the Cluster Version, e.g. GlusterFS 3.12.0.

screen shot 2017-09-08 at 3 08 50 pm

screen shot 2017-09-08 at 3 08 32 pm

@Tendrl/tendrl-core @Tendrl/qe @mcarrano @japplewhite

@julienlim
Copy link
Member Author

There is a proposal to solve this at Tendrl/commons#888.

@cloudbehl cloudbehl added this to the Milestone 5 (2018) milestone Apr 20, 2018
@gnehapk
Copy link
Member

gnehapk commented Sep 11, 2018

Closing this issue as fixed already.

@gnehapk gnehapk closed this as completed Sep 11, 2018
@sankarshanmukhopadhyay
Copy link

Does the workflow not require that this issue be cited in the PR which fixes it so that there is a link to the PR on the issue itself?

@gnehapk
Copy link
Member

gnehapk commented Sep 11, 2018

@sankarshanmukhopadhyay this issue is a duplicate of #656 where all the PRs have been tracked and attached.

The PR for this change is - #925

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants