New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does TestFX support JavaFX 17 and JDK 17 yet? #745
Comments
Seem this repo is dead, I like to make JavaFX support JDK 17 on Apple Silence, any documentation for the contributor? |
@yylonly What isn't working? JDK17+JavaFX19+TestFX in my case works. |
@trzimar are you using a modularized application? I just tried the junit5 extension (latest alpha) with the following result:
|
@alwins0n non modular and still on JUnit 4 |
@alwins0n This particular issue, with access to ParametersImpl may be resolved by #757. TestFX does support JDK9+, but ParametersImpl is still a protected class in JavaFX and we need to workaround that particular issue. If the upcoming release of TestFX 4 does not resolve the issue, you will still need to add the following to your JVM parameters:
|
thank you. for what it's worth my requirements were really simple and TestFX goes far beyond that. For my simple project I am happy with this little fellow of mine: https://github.com/alwins0n/fxtension |
Expected Behavior
Actual Behavior
To get the fastest possible support, create a minimal example
and upload it to GitHub.
Specifications
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: