Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for coverage 6 #320

Closed
McSinyx opened this issue Aug 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Support for coverage 6 #320

McSinyx opened this issue Aug 8, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@McSinyx
Copy link

McSinyx commented Aug 8, 2021

Hi, coverage 6.0b1 was released last month, could you investigate if coveralls is compatible with it and relax the runtime requirement sometime in the future?
@mgedmin
Copy link

mgedmin commented Oct 12, 2021

#326 implies that coveralls is not compatible with coverage 6.0 and relaxing the runtime requirement is insufficient.

This is not good for Python 3.10 support, since coverage 6.0 contains some Python 3.10 fixes that aren't present in the last coverage 5.x release.

@purificant
Copy link

It would be good to support coverage 6.0

@Ryochan7 Ryochan7 mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2021
Merged
@TheKevJames
Copy link
Owner

Now solved in v3.3.0! Thanks to @arcivanov for the PR submission :)

@arcivanov
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, @TheKevJames!

@purificant
Copy link

Thank you @TheKevJames, @arcivanov 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@mgedmin @TheKevJames @purificant @arcivanov @McSinyx