Fix docs for @slices_sample(5)
#98
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The docs have `slice_sample(5)` which only creates one sample (not 5). Perhaps this is a code issue and not a doc issue.
fix(slice docs): slice_sample(n=5)
|
Thank you so much! Let me look at the current behavior and will get this merged soon. |
|
Will take a look soon. Thank you so much for your work on this! |
- Bugfix: `@ungroup()` now preserves row-ordering (and is faster) - Bugfix: `slice_sample()` now throws an error if no `n` or `prop` keyword argument is provided - Bump minimum Julia version to 1.9
The docs have `slice_sample(5)` which only creates one sample (not 5). Perhaps this is a code issue and not a doc issue.
…o pr/GlenHertz/98
|
Thanks @GlenHertz for catching this. You are right that |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@slices_sample(5)doesn't create 5 samples (need@slices_sample(n=5)instead. Perhaps this is a coding issue (not a doc issue).