New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Type Hole De-Elaboration? #58

Open

solomon-b opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Labels

Feature

Collaborator

solomon-b commented Sep 1, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Type holes can get really gnarly, such as:

+ P : Poly
+ d : Σ (_ : base (fst C)), fib (fst C) _ ⇒ Σ (<2> : Σ (pbase : base (fst C)), Π (<196> : fib (fst C) pbase), base (fst C)), Σ (pfib : fib (fst C) (fst <2>)), fib (fst C) (snd <2> pfib)

Sometimes we know the unelaborated form of the type of some term and we annotate it in the code:

    let P : Poly := fst C in
    let d : P ⇒ tensor-◁ P P := fst (snd (snd C)) in

It would be really nice if the type hole reflected that un-elaborated (and thus easier to read) type.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

solomon-b added the Feature label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment