Add more err_tip for easier debugging

[allada]

Small change to make it a little easier to debug when something goes wrong.

---

This change is 

[allada]

+@blakehatch

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @blakehatch)

[blakehatch]

All other bare 15 await? and 10 await.maps besides the two mentioned have underlying error reporting so no err_tip is needed.

Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @allada)

---

cas/worker/running_actions_manager.rs line 366 at r1 (raw file):

        }

        let (mut file_nodes, dir_entries, mut symlinks) = try_join3(

nit: err_tip could be added here for thorough debugging as try_join has no error reporting.

---

cas/worker/running_actions_manager.rs line 516 at r1 (raw file):

                &self.work_directory,
            ));
            let (command, _) = try_join(command_fut, download_to_directory_fut).await?;

nit: another try_join that might benefit from an error output.

[allada]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @blakehatch)

---

cas/worker/running_actions_manager.rs line 366 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, blakehatch (Blake Hatch) wrote…

nit: err_tip could be added here for thorough debugging as try_join has no error reporting.

Adding an err_tip here would not tell us which one failed. It'd just say one of them failed. We expect the underlying futures to provide the useful errors.

---

cas/worker/running_actions_manager.rs line 516 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, blakehatch (Blake Hatch) wrote…

nit: another try_join that might benefit from an error output.

(same as above)

[blakehatch]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @allada)