Fix the incorrect config path in the documentation

[steedmicro]

Description

After the rewrite of the build infrastructure, all path problems are resolved successfully in code files.
But we missed some of them in the documentation.

Updating documentation needs to be done since it needs to be read by users.
Those documentation issues are fixed.

Fixes #415

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

Checklist

• Updated documentation if needed
• Tests added/amended
• bazel test //... passes locally
• PR is contained in a single commit, using git amend see some docs

---

This change is 

[allada]

Reviewed 2 of 4 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 2 of 4 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @steed924)

---

proto/com/github/trace_machina/native_link/remote_execution/worker_api.proto line 88 at r1 (raw file):

    ///
    /// The details on how to use this property can be found here:
    /// https://github.com/tracemachina/native-link/blob/master/native-link-config/src/cas_server.rs

nit: We need to pin the hash or else the code can change and make this comment link not work.

---

proto/genproto/com.github.trace_machina.native_link.remote_execution.pb.rs line 45 at r1 (raw file):

    /// /
    /// / The details on how to use this property can be found here:
    /// / <https://github.com/tracemachina/native-link/blob/master/native-link-config/src/cas_server.rs>

ditto.

[steedmicro]

Reviewable status: 2 of 4 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @allada)

---

proto/com/github/trace_machina/native_link/remote_execution/worker_api.proto line 88 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, allada (Nathan (Blaise) Bruer) wrote…

nit: We need to pin the hash or else the code can change and make this comment link not work.

done

---

proto/genproto/com.github.trace_machina.native_link.remote_execution.pb.rs line 45 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, allada (Nathan (Blaise) Bruer) wrote…

ditto.

done

[aaronmondal]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @allada)

[aaronmondal]

Thanks for catching these!

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @allada)

[MarcusSorealheis]

LGTM. I wonder if we should one day maintain a jsonc file that is a copy of all the json files. That way, we dan have one representation that is comment compatible so that our users do not need to edit the JSON but can still understand the reference jsonc's.

[allada]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @steed924)