Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The cls scores are useless on my own dataset #41

Closed
xiuzhizheng opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

The cls scores are useless on my own dataset #41

xiuzhizheng opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@xiuzhizheng
Copy link

Thanks for your awesome works. When I use Lidar-RCNN on my own dataset, the refine score is useless, Most objects are classified as backgrounds. In addition, the average refined center error is only reduced by 1 cm. I don't know Is this normal?

@Lzc6996
Copy link
Collaborator

Lzc6996 commented Dec 17, 2022

@xiuzhizheng
It looks like you give too much negtive samples in training set.

@xiuzhizheng
Copy link
Author

@xiuzhizheng It looks like you give too much negtive samples in training set.
Thank you for your apply. The ratio of positive samples is about 0.35. What range should we control this ratio。
One more question, In post-processing (/src/LiDAR_RCNN/utils/eval_utils.py line 78-83), we iterate through each box and assign it a score for each category, But in general, we choose the category with the largest score. Is this a trick?

@Lzc6996
Copy link
Collaborator

Lzc6996 commented Dec 19, 2022

@xiuzhizheng
You ratio seems fine.
Changing to the maximum score should not greatly affect the results.

@xiuzhizheng
Copy link
Author

@Lzc6996 Have you measured the increase in center point error?

@Lzc6996
Copy link
Collaborator

Lzc6996 commented Dec 19, 2022

@xiuzhizheng The Table 8 in our paper may help.

@xiuzhizheng
Copy link
Author

thanks for your help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants