Results and comments on the TulipaEnergyModel code review #688
datejada
started this conversation in
Show & Tell
Replies: 2 comments
-
@abelsiqueira and @gnawin, this is for our records to review this work and define the plan of action to continue with the code refactor. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
#415 is super useful to get the complete picture of the relationships of the inner functions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Input data names
create_input_dataframes
create_internal_structures
Example:
compute_constraints_partitions
compute_rp_partitions
solve_model
andsolve_model!
create_model
construct_dataframes
is not necessary.add_expression_terms_intra_rp_contraints
will need a refactor, and it will determine changes we need before and afterprofile_aggregation
functions are in the table in the documentationBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions