Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Associate parameters (from ESDL) with asset/flow attributes #91

Closed
Tracked by #88
lsoucasse opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #88

Associate parameters (from ESDL) with asset/flow attributes #91

lsoucasse opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@lsoucasse
Labels
Type: research Results in knowledge/decision rather than code Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals

Comments

@lsoucasse
Copy link

lsoucasse commented Sep 20, 2023 •
edited by clizbe

Ensure compatibility between ESDL asset/flows attributes with the model formulation.

The strategy is to play with the map editor to understand how parameters are assigned to flows/assets in ESDL. Then, compare with formulation and see if something has to be changed either on the ESDL side or on the model side.
@lsoucasse lsoucasse mentioned this issue Sep 20, 2023
Closed
8 tasks
@lsoucasse lsoucasse self-assigned this Sep 20, 2023
@lsoucasse lsoucasse added Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals Type: improvement Better way of doing something labels Sep 20, 2023
@clizbe clizbe changed the title associate parameters (from ESDL) with node/edge attributes Associate parameters (from ESDL) with node/edge attributes Sep 20, 2023
@clizbe clizbe added Type: research Results in knowledge/decision rather than code and removed Type: improvement Better way of doing something labels Sep 29, 2023
@clizbe clizbe changed the title Associate parameters (from ESDL) with node/edge attributes Associate parameters (from ESDL) with asset/flow attributes Oct 18, 2023
@datejada
Copy link
Member

datejada commented Nov 1, 2023

This should be part of #89

@datejada datejada closed this as completed Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lsoucasse lsoucasse

Labels
Type: research Results in knowledge/decision rather than code Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@clizbe @datejada @lsoucasse