Peer Review - Milestone 2

[alyciakb]

Milestone 2 Peer Review

Things that were well done:

• The EDA had a nice flow and was presented systematically. It started with numeric summaries and then moved on visual representations. Having both the numeric and visual representations made it easy to read and understand the data.
• The interpretation provided for the plots was very helpful. It helped to provide a clear understanding of the data and the inference drawn from the plots.

Things that could be improved:

• The mapping of Block 4 to 1 and Block 5 to 2 could have been more explicit. For example, maybe the mapping could have been added below the plot like it has been done for the other variables.
• A small explanation why some of the variables that were collected in the survey were not explored in the EDA would be a good addition.

Suggestions for Milestone 3:

• Although not necessary, a look at how some variables interact with each other would be a good area of exploration.

---

Review Authors
Alycia Butterworth
Sreya Guha
Fan Nie
Aaron Quinton