-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Urock Analyzer output #41
Comments
Thanks Jeremy. So the reason why the distortion to the profile is extended to unreasonable high height is because the building is "long". If we out the profile more in the middle it would look ok? Maybe we should just state that the URock Postprocessor is "under development"... Off topic: Did you submit the article poofs? |
Yes. But in my opinion it shouldn't be a problem to have long building. The denominator of the
Right ! Possible adding a flag in the QGIS plug-in ?
I should resent, GMD cannot read my comments. Can you ? |
|
Jessika, try to put line in the middle of the building. |
What is strange is the first layer of air above the roof. Can you do the simulation with a much smaller vertical resolution ? It seems you used something like 4 or five while your buildings are less than 5... |
aha... then we have an explanation. |
Still it might be interesting to know more about the real wind for such large building since it seems the Röckle scheme is not quite appropriate for them and that it concerns quite de lot of buildings (at least in Sweden). |
Hi,
I get a wierd output when i runt URock. I have a dummy area with a building running N-S and wind coming from SW. The building is 6m high:
I draw a line near the corner and the output shows wierd wind changes far above the building and the building divided in two:
When I run with vegetation i also dosn't seem to get the vegetation in the vertical wind profile.
Output folder:
Urock.zip
Data used:
URockDataIssue.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: