Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error linking consumption mixes, eLCI1 (v1.0) #117

Closed
bl-young opened this issue Jul 16, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

Error linking consumption mixes, eLCI1 (v1.0) #117

bl-young opened this issue Jul 16, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator

Several consumption mixes have a near-zero input from the generation mix (1E-15)

Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. - Yadkin Division
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - Gridforce South
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - Griffith Energy, LLC
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - NaturEner Power Watch, LLC (GWA)
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - NaturEner Wind Watch, LLC
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - New Harquahala Generating Company, LLC - HGBA
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - Southeastern Power Administration
Electricity; at grid; consumption mix - Western Area Power Administration - Upper Great Plains East

In most cases the generation processes exist and therefore are not being pulled accurately.

@bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note some overlap with #119

@m-jamieson
Copy link
Collaborator

These are intentional - they are balancing authority areas that are net exporters. I just set a very small input so that the consumption mix plans would generate something. Prior to setting to 1E-15, the consumption mix processes weren't getting generated.

@m-jamieson m-jamieson added this to the v1.0.1 milestone Jul 16, 2020
@WesIngwersen
Copy link
Collaborator

@bl-young suggests to remove these small fractions out and renormalize the totals to add to 1 with the remaining fractions

@WesIngwersen
Copy link
Collaborator

@jump2conclusionsmatt suggests we could manually find an energy mix for these BAs missing generation mixes

@bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@WesIngwersen I think your comments are swapped. The comments here apply to #119 and the comments there apply here (though there is some overlap)

@m-jamieson
Copy link
Collaborator

Started branch issues/117_119 for this. As discussed, the BAs that are purely exporting BAs are not having consumption mixes generated. The current changes in the branch achieve this. There are still consumption mixes at user that are still being generated. Will probably end up just dropping those from the dictionary at the time of posting the warnings about them.

@m-jamieson
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed with pull request #135.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants