-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bitmap import: translucency and linear mode #9078
Comments
In your screenshot, though hard to really judge, the two don't look exactly the same. The dark grey (second column in the image) looks thicker in the right than in the left. AFAIK, the option you are wondering about makes Cura interpret grey values differently. The Linear option is the most like you would expect it (ie: 50% grey is 50% of the height of the black), whereas with the Translucency option optimises thickness for actual translucency (ie: 50% grey is 50% more translucent than the black column). The theory is that the amount of light that comes through the model does not change linearly with the thickness of the model. |
Good to know. I kinda get it.... Is there a good reason why one would use one over the other? |
In theory, the "Translucency" option produces a better lithophane effect when held against the light. |
Application version
4.8
Platform
Win 10 nVidia RTX
Printer
Doesn't matter
Reproduction steps
Importing bitmaps for Lithosphanes
Screenshot(s)
Actual results
Linear or translucency are the same results.
Expected results
Not too sure, there is no documentation. But I'd assume some difference.
Project file
This was the test file I used.
Log file
Additional information
Just wondering if this is supposed to be this way or just why is there the two options? Is one better at a certain "color" image?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: