Doubt on propagation of conjuncts in Enhanced Dependencies

[GPPassos]

The documentation of enhanced dependencies presents 3 cases: conjoined verbs and verb phrases, conjoined subjects and objects, and conjoined modifiers.

Does it mean that only these 3 cases are allowed (so, for instance, it would be forbidden to propagate an amod to two conjoined nominals in "young boys and girls", or the dependency relation in conjoined function words) or are these 3 cases merely examples?

[dan-zeman]

We do not have examples with all parts of speech but coordination can apply to all parts of speech, and so does propagation of conjuncts.

[GPPassos]

Thanks! May I submit a PR making this explicit?

[dan-zeman]

Yes, please do.

[msklvsk]

By the way, conjoined modifiers are the most tedious part to implement enhanced dependencies for. If conjuncts are heterogeneous (e.g. adjectives mixed with noun phrases and/or clauses), you have to predict their relation, and there are dozens of combinations. Maybe it’s also worth to mention explicitly in the docs (that you have to predict).