Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed parsing of incomming packages when using rtde protocol v1 #114

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2022

Conversation

urmahp
Copy link
Collaborator

@urmahp urmahp commented Aug 29, 2022

The received rtde packages should be parsed slightly different whether we use protocol v1 or v2.

This will fix issue #113

Copy link
Collaborator

@fmauch fmauch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! As mentioned inside the code comments, it might be a good point to also add some failsafes for the case when there's more than version 1 and 2. @urmahp would you agree?

src/rtde/control_package_setup_outputs.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@fmauch
Copy link
Collaborator

fmauch commented Sep 26, 2022

Please rebase onto current master so we have a succeeding pipeline.

The received rtde packages should be parsed slightly different whether we use protocol v1 or v2.
@urmahp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

urmahp commented Sep 26, 2022

Should I squash the commits to one commit?

@fmauch
Copy link
Collaborator

fmauch commented Sep 26, 2022

Should I squash the commits to one commit?

We do that when merging. We usually use the "squash and merge" strategy.

Copy link
Collaborator

@fmauch fmauch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if pipeline succeeds.

@fmauch fmauch merged commit f31f998 into UniversalRobots:master Sep 26, 2022
@urmahp urmahp deleted the setup_outputs_protocolv1 branch October 3, 2022 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants