Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: suggest to use strategy constraints instead of custom strategies #4215

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

gastonfournier
Copy link
Contributor

About the changes

Custom activation strategies are still the recommended way to go in our documentation, but now most of the use cases for custom activation strategies can be covered by strategy constraints (released with Unleash 4.16)

With this change, we try to drive people to use strategy constraints.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 11, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 11, 2023 9:27am
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-monorepo-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 11, 2023 9:27am

Copy link
Contributor

@thomasheartman thomasheartman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great! Two minor suggestions, but both are non-blocking. Super nice work ❤️

website/docs/how-to/how-to-use-custom-strategies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/reference/custom-activation-strategies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
@gastonfournier gastonfournier merged commit 96bc5cc into main Jul 11, 2023
8 checks passed
@gastonfournier gastonfournier deleted the docs/downprioritize-custom-strategies branch July 11, 2023 09:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants