Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Combined import/export value in data.json/MQTT #746

Closed
jladefoged opened this issue Mar 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Combined import/export value in data.json/MQTT #746

jladefoged opened this issue Mar 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@jladefoged
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Grid import and grid export values are available in data.json, but software like OpenDTU-onBattery does only support one value and expect this value to be negative when exporting. The value is used with using the dynamic power limiter feature.

Describe the solution you'd like
Combined import/export value in data.json and perhaps MQTT as well.
Perhaps an "ie" value?

Describe alternatives you've considered
Requesting OpenDTU-onBattery to support import and export as seperate values.

Additional context
Link to OpenDTU-onBattery project:
https://github.com/helgeerbe/OpenDTU-OnBattery

@ArnieO
Copy link
Contributor

ArnieO commented Mar 10, 2024

This sounds like a reasonable improvement that can be useful for some users - unless someone sees a potential pitfall here?

@Noschvie
Copy link

Suggest to add an additional end point for the "OpenDTU-onBattery" feature based on current / other solutions.

@gskjold
Copy link
Member

gskjold commented Apr 14, 2024

I'd like some more info about this. Lets start with what opendtu is and what other integrations are like

@jladefoged
Copy link
Author

OpenDTU-onBattery will support separate import/export values in their next firmware version, but adding support for at negative consumption value in AMS Reader might still be a good idea for other future projects. If not the feature request may be closed.

@gskjold gskjold self-assigned this Jun 6, 2024
@gskjold gskjold added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 6, 2024
@gskjold gskjold added this to the v2.3.6 milestone Jun 6, 2024
@gskjold gskjold closed this as completed Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants