mbio: too many "sample ID" terms

[danicahelb]

I'm looking at the 2 mbio MALED studies and there are way too many sample ID terms!

Example: MALED 2yr study has the following sample IDs:
Sample ID (key identifier)
Sample ID (which is in a different format from the key identifier)
ClinEpiDB Sample ID
SRA Sample ID

In ticket #47, I requested that the data loaders use the same format for key identifiers in ClinEpi & mbio. After this is complete, we will be able to remove "ClinEpiDB sample ID"

Check in with @dpbisme about whether we need to load Sample ID and SRA Sample ID. If we want to keep both, we will need a more descriptive label for the "Sample ID" variable to distinguish it from the key identifier

[danicahelb]

checked in with @dpbisme on 12/15/2022

• mbio doesn’t care that sample IDs used on the website match sample IDs used by the original study team
• we will use the same format for key identifiers for both mbio and ClinEpi, so we will not need a separate variable for “ClinEpiDB Sample ID”
• SRA Sample ID can be useful to users, but we will remove this from appearing on the website & keep it in the download files (via hidden annotation)

@sweverschulman will work with @danicahelb to ensure this gets cleaned up properly

[danicahelb]

much better now