You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm looking at the 2 mbio MALED studies and there are way too many sample ID terms!
Example: MALED 2yr study has the following sample IDs:
Sample ID (key identifier)
Sample ID (which is in a different format from the key identifier)
ClinEpiDB Sample ID
SRA Sample ID
In ticket #47, I requested that the data loaders use the same format for key identifiers in ClinEpi & mbio. After this is complete, we will be able to remove "ClinEpiDB sample ID"
Check in with @dpbisme about whether we need to load Sample ID and SRA Sample ID. If we want to keep both, we will need a more descriptive label for the "Sample ID" variable to distinguish it from the key identifier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm looking at the 2 mbio MALED studies and there are way too many sample ID terms!
Example: MALED 2yr study has the following sample IDs:
Sample ID (key identifier)
Sample ID (which is in a different format from the key identifier)
ClinEpiDB Sample ID
SRA Sample ID
In ticket #47, I requested that the data loaders use the same format for key identifiers in ClinEpi & mbio. After this is complete, we will be able to remove "ClinEpiDB sample ID"
Check in with @dpbisme about whether we need to load Sample ID and SRA Sample ID. If we want to keep both, we will need a more descriptive label for the "Sample ID" variable to distinguish it from the key identifier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: