Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pdfjs-dist to 4.2.67 or later #1093

Open
Tyre88 opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 10 comments · May be fixed by #1105
Open

Update pdfjs-dist to 4.2.67 or later #1093

Tyre88 opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 10 comments · May be fixed by #1105

Comments

@Tyre88
Copy link

Tyre88 commented May 14, 2024

Bug Report or Feature Request (mark with an x)
- [ ] Regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped working in a new release)
- [ ] Bug report -> please search issues before submitting
- [x] Feature request
- [ ] Documentation issue or request

image

@janpapenbrock
Copy link

Should be fixed via #1092 I suppose?

@SimonFischer04
Copy link

Cve is resolved, but updating would give some other benefits anyway

@shamoon
Copy link
Contributor

shamoon commented May 15, 2024

Yea, worth noting though that pdfjs 4.x has major breaking changes. When I looked at it, it seemed like it would require major rewrites to this package. Not that it's impossible, of course, but certainly not a quick thing. At the very least though this issue is probably a duplicate of #1078

@SimonFischer04
Copy link

Yea, worth noting though that pdfjs 4.x has major breaking changes. When I looked at it, it seemed like it would require major rewrites to this package. Not that it's impossible, of course, but certainly not a quick thing. At the very least though this issue is probably a duplicate of #1078

Yeah,
Upgrading 2->3 was also already a new major version, but I guess there weren't that much (breaking) changes anyway? But now with 3->4 a lot more would be required?

@agravity-philipp
Copy link

I would also prefer to have it upgraded. Npm still mentioned in version 10.2.2 the high severity vulnerability in pdf.js.

But they mentioned an workaround to set the option isEvalSupported to false.
How would that be applied in ng2-pdf-viewer?

@pavliczandris
Copy link

pavliczandris commented May 24, 2024

I would also prefer to have it upgraded. Npm still mentioned in version 10.2.2 the high severity vulnerability in pdf.js.

But they mentioned an workaround to set the option isEvalSupported to false. How would that be applied in ng2-pdf-viewer?

In my understanding, it is done in this library to disable this option. This was patched here: #1092

The best and safest would be of course to upgrade the pdfjs-dist to the latest version, but I'm not sure if it's happening anytime soon.

@Tyre88
Copy link
Author

Tyre88 commented May 24, 2024

It was fixed in this for me, thanks alot! #1092

@Akxe
Copy link
Contributor

Akxe commented May 24, 2024

Updating to version 4 and above would fix this #624 and possibly also this #824 (Note that 824 is not complete, but a stale bot forced it to be completed anyway...)


These are possibly breaking changes according to release notes from https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/releases/tag/v4.0.189.

I have highlighted (points 3 & 5) that may pose a challenge:

  • Output JavaScript modules in the builds - This will require looking at where new ones are and how to load them properly.
  • I have no clue how, if at all, translations are handled in this package...

@manaskumar-tf
Copy link

@Tyre88 , vulnerability issue is not getting fixed with "ng2-pdf-viewer": "10.2.2" & "pdfjs-dist": "^3.11.174" version , any idea how to resolve this? or can you help me which file needs to be updated as we are not using pdfjs-dist directly , what changes need to be done in ng2-pdf-viewer?

@Akxe
Copy link
Contributor

Akxe commented Jun 3, 2024

You could use this in the meantime https://github.com/intbot/ng2-pdfjs-viewer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants