Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate Advanced Tab from Multiplayer tab on options #3762

Open
LambdaLuke87 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Separate Advanced Tab from Multiplayer tab on options #3762

LambdaLuke87 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@LambdaLuke87
Copy link

I have a request for something I would like them to fix, because the way it is currently is honestly ugly.
in liblist.gam there is a key called type that has two possible values: singleplayer_only or multiplayer_only
This will cause the multiplayer option to disappear in the options and instead the "advanced" option will appear, which are optional settings on the player's client side.
That it is this way honestly seems annoying to me because in my case I am creating a mod in multiplayer and singleplayer at the same time the advanced option goes unnoticed in the multiplayer option, I do understand the idea of ​​removing the multiplayer option if the value is singleplayer_only , but wouldn't it be better to give it its own tab in the options?
Here I leave an example that I made

how it is actually:
howitis

how it should be:
howitshouldbe

@LambdaLuke87
Copy link
Author

temporarily the way I thought of to make it more notable/relevant :)

image

@pierow
Copy link

pierow commented Feb 21, 2024

Just exposing the options UI code in the SDK for mods would be a much welcome improvement. There's a lot of options that aren't possible to add without a completely new UI implementation. Eg. Crosshair preview, double binding keys for per-team/class use, new video/audio/aim options, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants