Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Planning] Turn Minecloud into a more generic multi-player/socket-based/on-demand server hosting solution #26

Closed
314pies opened this issue Apr 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

[Planning] Turn Minecloud into a more generic multi-player/socket-based/on-demand server hosting solution #26

314pies opened this issue Apr 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@314pies

Comments

@314pies
Copy link
Contributor

314pies commented Apr 9, 2023

Description

Having a Minecraft hosting solution is nice. However, we should be able to go beyond that by making this solution generic for other multi-player/socket-based/on-demand server hosting.

Task

Plan out tasks to turn this into a generic hosting solution.

Test

N/A
@314pies 314pies mentioned this issue Apr 22, 2023
Closed
@314pies
Copy link
Contributor Author

314pies commented Apr 22, 2023 •
edited

I have some ideas already:

  1. Rename all minecraft string to mineclouds
  2. Move minecraft specific EC2 init to the minecloud_configs folder
    • Include port settings
  3. Make the "check for connection script" modular

@314pies 314pies self-assigned this Apr 23, 2023
@314pies
Copy link
Contributor Author

314pies commented May 19, 2023 •
edited

It will be nice if we can provide templates/package for other games as well.

@314pies
Copy link
Contributor Author

314pies commented May 22, 2023 •
edited

Related tasks published:
#55
#56

Resolving issue.

@314pies 314pies closed this as completed May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@314pies 314pies

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@314pies