Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for arm64 simulator architecture #54

Closed
jakov-clay opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Support for arm64 simulator architecture #54

jakov-clay opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@jakov-clay
Copy link

Will you support arm64 simulator architecture for M1 processor simulators?

I get this error when I try to build.
building for iOS Simulator, but linking in dylib built for iOS, file '......./Pods/VSCCrypto/Carthage/iOS/VSCCommon.framework/VSCCommon' for architecture arm64

@SergeySeroshtan
Copy link
Member

Hi!
Thanks for paying attention to the Virgil SDKs.
We're currently working on this issue and will distribute fix ASAP.

@SergeySeroshtan
Copy link
Member

@jakov-clay can you check this workaround ?

@SergeySeroshtan
Copy link
Member

Also the next answer can help
AppsFlyerSDK/AppsFlyerFramework#150 (comment)

@jakov-clay
Copy link
Author

Hi @SergeySeroshtan,
yes, I'm using the workarounds at the moment.
You can also include those in podspec of your framework until you have a time to take care of this. It omits need for workaround from integrators side.
s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'arm64' } s.user_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'arm64' }

I'm asking because I have a framework which has your frameworks as dependency. I wanted to provide arm64 simulator support but can't do that until you do :)

I just wanted to make sure you are aware of this and have it somewhere in plan. Is there an ETA maybe?

Thanks for answers.

@SergeySeroshtan
Copy link
Member

@jakov-clay,
thanks for suggestions.
At the very moment we check possibility to use XCFramework bundle format to figure out this issue.
What approach you are using for your framework?

@jakov-clay
Copy link
Author

Yes, you are right, you need to support XCFramework format to be able add that missing arch.
I'm using XCFramework format.

@jakov-clay
Copy link
Author

With version 8.0.0 this issue is resolved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants