Add table virtualization to improve performance

[asimonok]

Resolves #63

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (3ac92c3) 99.07% compared to head (0f5db40) 98.85%.

❗ Current head 0f5db40 differs from pull request most recent head 3123e97. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3123e97 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #64      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.07%   98.85%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines         753      785      +32     
  Branches      151      160       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits          746      776      +30     
+ Misses          2        1       -1     
- Partials        5        8       +3     

Files	Coverage Δ
jest-setup.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/ButtonView/ButtonView.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/OptionsVariable/OptionsVariable.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/TableView/TableView.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/hooks/useRuntimeVariables.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/types/variable.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/utils/table.ts	97.72% <100.00%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
src/hooks/useTable.tsx	96.33% <93.75%> (-0.76%)	⬇️
src/utils/variable.ts	98.14% <95.23%> (+3.41%)	⬆️
src/components/Table/Table.tsx	95.23% <83.33%> (-4.77%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mikhail-vl]

Looks good!