Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reason for Masking with Date / Version #13

Open
SharifShaaban-PHS opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Reason for Masking with Date / Version #13

SharifShaaban-PHS opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@SharifShaaban-PHS
Copy link

Hi,

We recently implemented masking using this table. We realised that certain sites might only require masking when using a particular primer set as we are seeing sites for lineage defining mutations being masked (e.g. G24410A for Delta which we are reluctant to mask). We receive data from several sequencing laboratories that use different primer versions. Would be possible to add a column to the table that specify for coordinates that are being masked for: amplicon_drop_or_primer_artefact which primer type this relates to?

Cheers

@W-L
Copy link
Owner

W-L commented Apr 12, 2022

Thanks for your message. We are currently investigating if there is a straight-forward way to add such flags to cross-reference problematic sites with amplicon primers in an automated and updateable manner. Thanks for the suggestion!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants