Use case 1 is too broadly scoped by its headline

[jan-ivar]

"Cross-app communication" is a means to an end, not a use case.

A descriptive headline of the use case presented would be: “User drives a captured presentation app from a VC app”.

This is important for scope.

[lgrahl]

I don't want to open an issue just for that, so forgive the slight sidetrack but I think it fits well in here: Maybe explain the term VC at least once. It took me quite a while. 😉

[jan-ivar]

Thanks @lgrahl, I've updated the PR #7.

[alvestrand]

This comment is fine as a proposed clarification, but I don't see this as a reasonable issue to raise as a blocker for adoption.

[jan-ivar]

Use cases determine the scope of the problems we're adopting to solve, so this seems relevant.

[eladalon1983]

Please see the discussion's conclusion here.