You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Post-view conversion measurement is central to adtech performance measurement, as last-touch models mixing post-view and post-click probably represent the majority of direct response campaigns.
This is as we see one of the most basic needs of advertisers regarding optimization: being able to report on conversions and get the raw material to optimize towards high-performing contexts (by using the reporting API to report on the performance of each context).
PV conversion measurement is a bit trickier to implement than PC conversion measurement in a privacy-preserving way, as it has been mentioned in several repositories/issues, and if I understand well this issue summarizes the current “state-of-the-art” regarding the topic. Even if it would take some testing to find the best one, there are already some ideas in it which would at least provide a first answer.
Our assessment is that continuing to support post-view measurement is mandatory if the objective of FLEDGE is to be widely adopted in an industry where post-click measurement is not the norm (and is not adapted to e.g acquisition campaigns whose objective is to generate a lot of small increments in probability to convert through multiple exposures).
Thus the question is more on FLEDGE general agenda: is it safe to assume that the removal of 3rd party cookies will not happen before a measurement solution for both post-view and post-click has been implemented?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Post-view conversion measurement is central to adtech performance measurement, as last-touch models mixing post-view and post-click probably represent the majority of direct response campaigns.
This is as we see one of the most basic needs of advertisers regarding optimization: being able to report on conversions and get the raw material to optimize towards high-performing contexts (by using the reporting API to report on the performance of each context).
PV conversion measurement is a bit trickier to implement than PC conversion measurement in a privacy-preserving way, as it has been mentioned in several repositories/issues, and if I understand well this issue summarizes the current “state-of-the-art” regarding the topic. Even if it would take some testing to find the best one, there are already some ideas in it which would at least provide a first answer.
Our assessment is that continuing to support post-view measurement is mandatory if the objective of FLEDGE is to be widely adopted in an industry where post-click measurement is not the norm (and is not adapted to e.g acquisition campaigns whose objective is to generate a lot of small increments in probability to convert through multiple exposures).
Thus the question is more on FLEDGE general agenda: is it safe to assume that the removal of 3rd party cookies will not happen before a measurement solution for both post-view and post-click has been implemented?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: