Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FLEDGE: clarification on support for post-view conversion measurement #131

Open
RLemonnierScibids opened this issue Mar 3, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@RLemonnierScibids
Copy link

Post-view conversion measurement is central to adtech performance measurement, as last-touch models mixing post-view and post-click probably represent the majority of direct response campaigns.

This is as we see one of the most basic needs of advertisers regarding optimization: being able to report on conversions and get the raw material to optimize towards high-performing contexts (by using the reporting API to report on the performance of each context).

PV conversion measurement is a bit trickier to implement than PC conversion measurement in a privacy-preserving way, as it has been mentioned in several repositories/issues, and if I understand well this issue summarizes the current “state-of-the-art” regarding the topic. Even if it would take some testing to find the best one, there are already some ideas in it which would at least provide a first answer.

Our assessment is that continuing to support post-view measurement is mandatory if the objective of FLEDGE is to be widely adopted in an industry where post-click measurement is not the norm (and is not adapted to e.g acquisition campaigns whose objective is to generate a lot of small increments in probability to convert through multiple exposures).

Thus the question is more on FLEDGE general agenda: is it safe to assume that the removal of 3rd party cookies will not happen before a measurement solution for both post-view and post-click has been implemented?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant