Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Queries #1

Open
msehabibur opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Queries #1

msehabibur opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@msehabibur
Copy link

Hi, can I possibly know the meaning of 1 in the following snippet? "V_Zn 3 1" Please see the snapshot. Also, for example, in "0 1.41538 1", I understand the first and second entries are q and defect formation energy at zero fermi level, or VBM, but can I know interpretation of third entries that is "1"?
Screenshot 2024-04-12 at 4 40 24 PM

@msehabibur
Copy link
Author

Another question, can you please explain why, for some defects, the hole capture coefficient is 1, while for others it is zero?Can you please explain Sn_Zn (+1/+2) for example?
Screenshot 2024-04-12 at 4 44 14 PM

@xw-w
Copy link
Contributor

xw-w commented Apr 15, 2024

Hi!

  • The input-fermi.dat file is sourced from the sc-fermi package and follows the same format. Specifically:

    • The first line indicates whether system is spin polarised or not (1 = non-spin polarised; 2 = spin polarised)
    • The number in the third column is the degeneracy term which refers to the number of possible electron configurations for a defect in a particular charge state, including spin degeneracy and geometry degeneracy
  • For the question of capture coefficients, although we recommend you to input the actual calculated capture coefficients, sometimes you may want to simplify the procedure:

    • Since the trap-limited efficiency of the entire system is limited by the transition with the largest capture coefficient, you may put 0 if the capture process of a certain defect has a negligible effect
    • Within a single transition, the capture is always limited by the slower process (whether electron or hole capture). So you may put 1 if the certain capture process is extremely fast

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants