New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does anyone try the SOLO model for thin, dotted line? #43
Comments
@pvthuy What's your loss functions? I suggest using Focal Loss as mask prediction loss. And did you mean the class scores are low or mask prediction after sigmoid? |
@pvthuy If you didn't change the loss part of that config file, then you were using dice loss for mask prediction. However, for your case, Focal Loss might be better. We extended SOLO to instance contour detection. You can refer to Section 7 of our paper. BTW, for the current model, you can set a smaller mask threshold (e.g. 0.2 instead of 0.5 in default). |
@WXinlong Thank you very much! I changed dice loss to focal loss, and mask threshold 0.5 to 0.2. Anw, thanks for your help. |
I tried it for the text,i keep the origin para,and it looks good! |
hello , Can you please shed some light on how to change the loss function to focal-lossas suggested previously. can you please explain exeactly what needs to be changed?
thanks, |
Does anyone try the SOLO model for thin, dotted line like this?
For the above image with one object (line), assume that I have many small polygons for that line.
I observed that the SOLO model did not perform well (the scores are very low).
Any suggestions on improving the data, or modifying the hyper-parameters?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: