-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[VDG] MusicBox redesign #9051
Comments
Great writeup. I do like the idea of getting the functionality in the privacy homescreen tile, this way there is a lot more vertical screen space. |
I personally like the only aura option, and when hovering over it you get the musicbox. |
Only aura is great. Screen looks much cleaner. But how does the user know where to hover? Also why not redesign the entire music box down the line as @jmacato proposed? |
@nopara73 @BTCparadigm @molnard @MaxHillebrand @zkSNACKs/visual-design-group Today we discussed in the VDG meeting about the need to agree upon a definite design for this within this week. After that, the UI team will arrive upon a final design and start implementing that. Thanks! |
Let's make that official 😄 |
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
I think this is something that the UI team will grab in the near future. |
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This is still relevant, and the music box is still one of the sources for users' confusion that they keep complaining about. |
This should go to the UX board. |
For the record: #9685 (comment)
Also a related issue: #8855 |
This issue is still relevant and should be fixed, however I'm closing it as it will not be worked on in a foreseeable future |
Motivation
Numerous issues have been raised in the past about the MusicBox. The UX with it is not so good and its whole purpose is slowly going away from the reason for its implementation in the first place: To have a clear and concise way for the user to understand how its privacy is being improved.
Too many messages, too complex to understand, non-pertinent information, etc...
Its whole concept goes against the WW2.0 mantra, "simplicity by default".
It's a double edged-sword, because some users will want to know what's going on, and they must be able to get the information. But most of the users might not even know what CoinJoin is. All the design decisions of 2.0 have been taken to make WW usable with only this knowledge:
Improvement ideas
A consensus has to be reached on a solution displaying by default little to no information about what is happening, and the ability to opt-in for details.
Here are some draft designs implementing this philosophy to help figure out a proper solution:
Only aura, classic MusicBox on hover
Only aura with a toggle, classic MusicBox on hover/click
Simplified MB with info button, on hover/click window with details and toggle for details by default
Simplified MB, on hover scroll to display details with link to doc
Simplified MB with toggle, on hover/click scroll to display details
Flickering privacy bar with cropped window bottom and on hover window with details
@jmacato also proposed in this comment to use a progress bar, it would also be a proper fix.
This specific element of the UI is extremely important as it's the only way users can "interact" with the CoinJoin backend. The designs displayed here are just for presenting ideas, and their elements can be "cherry-picked" to have a nice final solution.
Issues currently opened
#9024, #8695 , #8696, #8181 and all others issues/discussions opened by users about confusing messages
Please discuss the concept.
Special thanks to @yahiheb for the initial idea and the help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: