Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GIfTI image orientation #28

Closed
neurolabusc opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

GIfTI image orientation #28

neurolabusc opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@neurolabusc
Copy link

When I attempt to load reference GIfTI images they appear upside down (flipped in the head-foot dimension). Viewing the GIfTI header with a text editor suggests it uses an identity matrix, so this would not be influenced by applying the matrix to the points. I am using wb_view 1.3.2 on MacOS. The images that look wrong are the Brainvisa GIFTI samples v1.3 included in the BV_GIFTI_1.3.tar.gz, for example the sujet01_Lwhite.inflated.surf.gii. The image orientation also looks odd with independent Matlab scripts, so perhaps this is an issue with the reference images rather than the Connectome Workbench. However, since the GIfTI format was developed by the Workbench team, it might be good to determine if these odd images should be removed from the reference, or if the GIfTI specification should be clarified to allow consistent performance across tools.

@glasserm
Copy link

glasserm commented Jan 8, 2019

I think the issue is likely with the header of the NIFTI file OR it is possible that the surface coordinates were not saved correctly.

@neurolabusc
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the clarification. I am closing this issue, as the problem is with the GIfTI reference dataset, not Connectome Viewer. I have posted a issue on the GIfTI NITRC forum.

@johnvelab
Copy link

johnvelab commented Jan 8, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants