-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Particle flows visualization #57
Comments
If you want to check flow penetration, you should plot the normal velocity component, not the vorticity. |
Is that because the vorticity is effectively smoothed a bit? Perhaps the question I really had was what is the best way to visualize flow around a shape like this? Is there an example of how to insert tagged particles (aka smoke)? |
Great suggestion! Thanks. Would you like to have me file a pull request with an example resulting from this effort? |
Hmmm... that article looks excellent except that all of the good bits are paywalled. Do you have a preprint copy? Or is the source code for the results that you present in sections 3.1 and 3.2 available? Again, these seem like they would make very good examples to include in WaterLily. Happy to do the (small compared to what you have done) work to prepare those. |
Good point. I'll revise that link in the other issue. That paper was done using an older Fortran code. Waterlily is a new implementation of the same method in Julia. |
Not yet. That would be a nice addition. Possibly, we should have a separate flow visualization folder with metrics.jl and other efforts such as this suggestion. |
I made a new repo with a tracer |
I have adapted the TwoBody_circle example to use a different shape. The flow seems to penetrate into the body.
Is this a problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: