Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Occlusion culling #22

Open
cdriesler opened this issue Oct 13, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Occlusion culling #22

cdriesler opened this issue Oct 13, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request methodology subjective implementation details/choices
Projects
0.4.X

Comments

@cdriesler
Copy link
Contributor

If paths store their extents on creation, then there is enough information to know whether a given geometry will be in view on compile. Re-computing the slab geometry with occlusion, while faster than computing without, may be slower than just reading the cache and letting viewBox handle the rest, though. Some testing required.

Maybe paths should cache themselves, not just slabs? Then it would just be a choice between reading in the cache or not.
@cdriesler cdriesler added enhancement New feature or request methodology subjective implementation details/choices labels Oct 13, 2019
@cdriesler cdriesler added this to To do in 0.4.X via automation Oct 13, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request methodology subjective implementation details/choices
Projects
0.4.X
  
To do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cdriesler