Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(AudioPannerNodeModels): AudioPannerNode models underdefined #120

Closed
olivierthereaux opened this issue Sep 11, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@olivierthereaux
Copy link
Contributor

Originally reported on W3C Bugzilla ISSUE-17410 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:39:22 GMT
Reported by Michael[tm] Smith
Assigned to

Audio-ISSUE-61 (AudioPannerNodeModels): AudioPannerNode models underdefined [Web Audio API]

http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/issues/61

Raised by: Marcus Geelnard
On product: Web Audio API

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#AudioPannerNode

The panning models (EQUALPOWER et.al.) are undefined.

@olivierthereaux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original comment by Olivier Thereaux on W3C Bugzilla. Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:18:37 GMT

Meeting minutes, 23 May 2012:

« Next on the agenda was the reference to OpenAL in the web audio spec, as mentioned in ISSUE-61. The web audio api draft only gives a rough reference to OpenAL in AudioPanner and AudioListener, and that is problematic because we cannot find the IP licensing terms of that spec, nor do we know whether we could quote parts of the spec without copyright issues. Doug will investigate. »

Assigning to Doug. Will revisit once the IPR concerns are cleared or clarified.

@olivierthereaux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original comment by Olivier Thereaux on W3C Bugzilla. Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:38:47 GMT

Updated link to the PannerNode: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#PannerNode

@joeberkovitz
Copy link
Contributor

The section http://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#spatialization-panning now supplies definition of the EqualPower model as requested in #96

@cwilso
Copy link
Contributor

cwilso commented Oct 30, 2014

I think this is resolved.

@cwilso cwilso closed this as completed Oct 30, 2014
@joeberkovitz
Copy link
Contributor

Don't we ultimately need to resolve the OpenAL/HRTF definition facet of this issue for the proposed Spatialization node in #372?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants