Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Motion Path #187

Closed
danielsakhapov opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Motion Path #187

danielsakhapov opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
position: support topic: animation Spec relates to animation (including transitions) topic: css Spec relates to CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) venue: W3C CSS WG venue: W3C SVG WG Proposal is being reviews in the W3C's SVG Working Group

Comments

@danielsakhapov
Copy link

WebKittens

No response

Title of the spec

Motion Path

URL to the spec

https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion/

URL to the spec's repository

No response

Issue Tracker URL

No response

Explainer URL

No response

TAG Design Review URL

No response

Mozilla standards-positions issue URL

mozilla/standards-positions#802

WebKit Bugzilla URL

No response

Radar URL

No response

Description

The spec has been reworked, so requesting for the signal from you as it is a part of Interop 2023.

@hober hober added topic: css Spec relates to CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) topic: animation Spec relates to animation (including transitions) venue: W3C CSS WG venue: W3C SVG WG Proposal is being reviews in the W3C's SVG Working Group labels May 18, 2023
@nt1m
Copy link
Member

nt1m commented Aug 22, 2023

We generally support the updated spec, will mark as support in one week pending objections.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
position: support topic: animation Spec relates to animation (including transitions) topic: css Spec relates to CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) venue: W3C CSS WG venue: W3C SVG WG Proposal is being reviews in the W3C's SVG Working Group
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants