Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ContentVisibilityAutoStateChanged event #33

Closed
vmpstr opened this issue Jul 11, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

ContentVisibilityAutoStateChanged event #33

vmpstr opened this issue Jul 11, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
from: Bloomberg Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Bloomberg. from: Google Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Google. position: support topic: css Spec relates to CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) topic: events Spec relates to DOM events topic: layout Spec relates to layout topic: rendering venue: W3C CSS WG

Comments

@vmpstr
Copy link

vmpstr commented Jul 11, 2022

Request for position on an emerging web specification: ContentVisibilityAutoStateChanged event

Information about the spec

Design reviews and vendor positions

Anything else we need to know

CSSWG discussion: w3c/csswg-drafts#7384 (comment)

@othermaciej othermaciej added venue: W3C CSS WG topic: css Spec relates to CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) topic: layout Spec relates to layout topic: rendering topic: events Spec relates to DOM events labels Jul 15, 2022
@othermaciej othermaciej added from: Google Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Google. from: Bloomberg Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Bloomberg. labels Sep 25, 2022
@hober hober self-assigned this Mar 27, 2023
@hober
Copy link
Member

hober commented Mar 29, 2023

@annevk
Copy link
Contributor

annevk commented Jun 19, 2023

So this event is intentionally not synchronized with rendering updates? Although it does seem like the task queueing should happen from the "update the rendering" algorithm given what appears to trigger it.

cc @smfr @nt1m

@nt1m
Copy link
Member

nt1m commented Jun 19, 2023

@rwlbuis @cathiechen

@annevk
Copy link
Contributor

annevk commented Sep 6, 2023

Discussing this with colleagues it seems like this should be "position: support". If anyone disagrees, please say so within a week. Thanks!

@nt1m
Copy link
Member

nt1m commented Sep 6, 2023

This is fine to us, and we actually landed the implementation in WebKit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from: Bloomberg Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Bloomberg. from: Google Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Google. position: support topic: css Spec relates to CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) topic: events Spec relates to DOM events topic: layout Spec relates to layout topic: rendering venue: W3C CSS WG
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants