Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training Loss Abnormal #35

Open
Haoyanlong opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Training Loss Abnormal #35

Haoyanlong opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@Haoyanlong
Copy link

Haoyanlong commented Jul 13, 2022

@andreasjansson @Wendison Hello, sorry to interrupt you! I'm a rookie of voice model. I have trained the model in VCTK-Corpus-0.92.zip dataset by "python3 train.py use_CSMI=True use_CPMI=True use_PSMI=True" in NVIDIA V100S. But after 65 epochs, the train loss are as follows:
image
Could you give me some advice? Thank you very much!

@Wendison
Copy link
Owner

Hi, I think the lld losses are normal, you could train for more epoches and listen to converted samples to verify whether your training is successful.

@Haoyanlong
Copy link
Author

@Wendison Hello! I have two questions:

  1. The default epoch of training is 500. I have achieved the process, training log as folllows(500 epochs). Whether each loss value meets expectations?
    image

  2. I want to see the training effect quickly.How many epochs do you suggest to train?
    Thank you!

@Wendison
Copy link
Owner

  1. I don't remember the exact value of each loss, but I think your losses should be normal according to the losses shown in Loss value and reconstruction gender change #15 (comment)
  2. Based on my experience, 500 epoches can obtain stable conversion results. After 500 epoches, I didn't see any noticable performance improvements. One direct way to select the suitable epoch is to listen to intermediate converted samples during training.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants