You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To better match the API design used for the new Geoprocessing API (#2201), make it so this endpoint accepts GeoJSON in the POST body, and all other parameters (catalog, query, from_date, to_date) are in the query.
Also, add a wkaoi query parameter, that if present with an empty POST body, causes a lookup of a well-known AoI by that name. If no such entry is found, the endpoint should return a 404.
If neither a wkaoi nor a valid GeoJSON is found in the POST body, then return a 400.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of #2258, we have a good common framework for filters, but are still constructing the parameters in a level above (in startSearch). The filters would be easier to work with / compose if they could provide their own parameters, so we could do something like this:
As of #2246, we are sending the full geometry of the area of interest for searching, in a payload akin to this:
To better match the API design used for the new Geoprocessing API (#2201), make it so this endpoint accepts GeoJSON in the POST body, and all other parameters (
catalog
,query
,from_date
,to_date
) are in the query.Also, add a
wkaoi
query parameter, that if present with an empty POST body, causes a lookup of a well-known AoI by that name. If no such entry is found, the endpoint should return a 404.If neither a
wkaoi
nor a valid GeoJSON is found in the POST body, then return a 400.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: