Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WinMerge 2011? Kimmo Varis validated? #41

Closed
Neustradamus opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

WinMerge 2011? Kimmo Varis validated? #41

Neustradamus opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Good news to see this github!

This project is same that WinMerge 2011?
https://bitbucket.org/jtuc/winmerge2011/
https://bitbucket.org/jtuc/winmerge2011/commits/

It is Kimmo Varis (...) validated?

@gerundt
Copy link
Collaborator

gerundt commented Oct 5, 2017

WinMerge 2011 is a fork from Jochen Tucht. This Version can run with Wine even under Linux!

Kimmo Varis is not active the last years.

@sdottaka
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the clarification.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

Neustradamus commented Feb 17, 2018

It is not possible to have one team?
@gerundt @sdottaka and jtuc

I have seen: https://sourceforge.net/p/winmerge/news/2018/01/a-sign-of-life-from-winmerge/ :)

datadiode added a commit to datadiode/winmerge-v2 that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2019
sdottaka pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2019
sdottaka pushed a commit to sdottaka/winmerge-v2-jp that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2019
sdottaka pushed a commit to sdottaka/winmerge-v2-jp that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2019
sdottaka added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2019
…tbucket-m-1558418388297 (pull request #41)

Russian.po edited online with Bitbucket

Approved-by: Timon34 <kaktebyavirubit@gmail.com>
sdottaka pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2019
--HG--
branch : stable
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants