Can automatic highlight certain type, CP or IV pokemon?

[edmondhk]

It would be nice if it can automatic highlight certain type, CP or IV pokemon?
Even better with different colours.
High CP in red
High IV in yellow
Mewtwo in green

Of course it have to define in option.

[QuAzI]

It will be great if types colored as defined in game or like this
http://www.fanboysanonymous.com/2016/02/explaining-why-pokemon-type-advantages.html

Some IV calculators color IV column: low level - red background, than pink, yellow, white for normal pokemons, lime and green for best pokemons. It helps choose better pokemon for evolve.

Example of IV colors

[QuAzI]

I think pokemons which can't be evolved must have gray columns "Candies" and "To evolve"

[Wolfsblvt]

Color highlighting would be a really cool thing. Will be planned later with the new UI.

[QuAzI]

If pokemon in GYM it cannot be transferred, evolved or upgraded. This row can be grayIf pokemon in GYM it cannot be transferred, evolved or upgraded. This row can be completely gray (like inactive control)

[Wolfsblvt]

Planned ToDos on that from here:

• Color-code ascending/descending columns (if wanted), like CP and IV
• Grey out rows with gym pokemons that can't be used right now
• Grey out "To Evolve" if it can't be evolved

That means it contains some requests from #44.

[ritsu]

I was working on something similar before I decided to drop it and use this wonderful app. Here's a screenshot of what I had when I stopped, in case it helps give any ideas.

I find pokemon icons easier to read than pokemon names, but it might not be a good idea to include them here because of copyright issues. Maybe have an option to allow the user to use icons they've downloaded elsewhere? (e.g. https://github.com/Superviral/Pokemon-GO-App-Assets-and-Images) Or is that still too complicit / not worth the effort?

[Wolfsblvt]

Yeah, most of things are already planned and will be added with the new GUI (: Like IV coloring, Favorite stars, that gym thingy.

Sprites are an idea and maybe possible, yes. Was noted already in #49.