Regarding the community split #2960
Comments
|
contribution is always welcome. this repo is back to active development, with tons of bug fix and performance improvement. |
|
the roadmap for recently release will focus on stability and performance (e.g. first query after launch is slow, although is faster now in new release). the roadmap for new ui will be similar to below ui mock up.
and there are new theme to make it blur like windows. |
|
Would it be possible for me to join the GitHub organization in order to organize a bit better everything? I mean stuff like moving all questions into Spectrum rather than GitHub issues so roadmap is clear. Updating the README, etc.... Also, I'd help reviewing PRs, etc... My key point is that Wox is so great, that we should be working all together in making it even better, as it is the go-to replacement of Alfred for Windows, and I'd love to make Wox be as high quality as Alfred |
|
@NickSeagull |
|
Hi all. Refreshing to see this discussion started... adding a few thoughts and opinions to what has been said so far.
I think there is room for both Wox and Flow to coexist and thrive. Wox has a lot of traction already and can continue its development/maintenance, while Flow can introduce big changes (some have already been introduced) before the initial release. Flow can divert enough from Wox to justify its existence. Of course, this is a community decision... If Flow contributors would prefer to focus their efforts on Wox again, that's great. That said... @bao-qian I'm also happy to contribute to your effort here, by backporting changes (where it makes sense to), reviewing PRs, etc
Please consider taking a vote/feedback from the community on this. Sorry for being negative, but Spectrum has been a bad experience for me: pages take too long to load, email notifications are no longer coming through, and the platform does not seem very flexible/powerful in general... That said, a solution that takes questions/etc out of github issues is welcome. I think a platform for direct team/public chat is important, as well... |
|
Yep, I'll create a poll for this. Spectrum is my go-to solution, because it is the free one that works at least on average well. My biggest concern is having 500+ issues where most of them are general usage questions. These should be addressed separately in another place, in order to foster progress for the project :) |
|
Tools like Flow, Wox, PowerToys Run at their core are great because they are open for extensions by community made plugins. I think that's the most important, there is definitely room for all three to co-exist. My perspective, we could start the discussion including Microsoft to have the same plugin interface. This will mean plugin developers when they develop, it's for all three launchers, and plugins are shared and transferable. I would say, just for Flow and Wox, they don't need to have the same set of changes, but for their progress if both project's contributors are up for it, they can help with both, but more importantly these projects (hopefully PT Run as well) should be using the same plugin interface so the focus is more on helping plugin community to thrive. |
|
@jjw24 I think we should try to strike a balance between:
|
|
since there are two forks now, and we do have disagreement in terms of ui.
MS and Flow can built on top of Wox by add |
|
@JohnTheGr8 |
|
in terms of features in Flow, every feature and bug fix has already been ported to wox from flow. |
|
@bao-qian @jjw24 I think it would be really a shame to split the project. Is there no way you guys can align the roadmap? Don't let this be another open-office / libre-office. I don't think the goal and feature set diverges so much that it requires a fork and a new project (unlike e.g. opera/vivaldi or openelec/libreelec). Collaboration is always better! Unless there are good reasons for Flow to split if I'd strongly favor merging the projects again. I think until now most changes proposed by Flow could also be a setting? |
|
Agree with @skjerns |
|
I'm also agree with @skjerns |
|
Just adding my two cents, as I was very inactive within the Flow community recently, and since @bao-qian is pushing on Wox again: I would love to see merging Flow with Wox. (as it seems to be already happendd), since it would be a shame to split the creative minds behind both projects. Foremost, if we are all back in one repository we don’t need to worry about plugin compatibility. In any way Wox should be compatible with PowerToys Run Plugins, once they announced their specifications—which hopefully rely on Wox (pointing to microsoft/PowerToys#3200). This would be crucial, as I think PowerToys Run will have the highest impact regarding its reach in the future. Second, imo I really like the UI of the new PT Run / Wox concept. In anyway, I think if there are future fundamental UI disagreements, I would suggest to solve this by polling the users within the Wox repo. Yet, in general, I think it is good be close to the UI of PT Run, so people who switch from PT Run to Wox (or vice versa) feel familiar. These were my 0.02$ |
|
@bao-qian it's nice to hear you and the community will continue with this project, but why is the last "stable" release from 2018: |
|
Any news on this? |
|
What is the status of this? Is Wox Launcher still being developed or has Flow Launcher over taken it? |
|
It seems like the active development on Wox has been at a minimum. Flow however receives updates more frequently. @jjw24 It really is a shame that you two could not put your efforts together. To this date I see literally no difference between Flow and Wox besides some superficial changes. I just can't see why you could not align? It is a lose-lose situation for all of us. |
|
Biggest win for Flow is that there is no requirement for Everything. Plus you get the ability to search within files. Both facts ain’t superficial. |
|
@bao-qian any news? Please don't let this projekt die! |
|
@R-Studio Why not just use Flow Launcher? I have been using it. |
|
@wangyang1633 You are right and Flow Launcher is really a nice alternativ! |
|
Wox is a so good software! Please don't let it die. Are you still working on it? @bao-qian Although @jjw24 has done a lot of development on Flow, made a lot of upgrades to it. But I still want both of you to work together to make Wox better. I know it's very very hard, almost impossible. |
|
@HaleShaw Flow is literally Wox with fixes and additions |
Yes, of cause. I know that Flow has many fixes and upgrades. Just like I want Wox to get better, I think so does @jjw24. And he proved himself by his actions, fixed Wox himself and created Flow. **Anyway, I just hope that someone will continue to develop and improve this software.**😊 |
|
This issue is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 3 days. |
|
bad bot |
|
This issue is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 3 days. |
|
Suggestion to add the label |
There has been an active fork going on at
jjw24/Wox, and a discussion to split the Wox community, because the non-organization of this one. It ended up being renamed as a new project called Flow@bao-qian stated that he has retaken the development again, and given that he has a bit more time now, perhaps it is a good time to organize the organization, add more members, and include changes from the fork.
Summoning @jjw24 , @theClueless , @kalaschnik , @SysC0mp , @JohnTheGr8 , @gdziedzic to hear their opinions on this.
We have already setup some infrastructure on Flow, like spectrum for managing questions, CI/CD, and other stuff. But given that a lot of people know Wox already, perhaps it'd make sense to merge them both again, and modernize the experience?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: