New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change to a more fitting name #8
Comments
Also note that the command |
What is prog^I - inverse pipe? |
Ctrl-i is the code for tab. |
I have noticed my original post is missing a couple words... "I wager a bet that most people won't use the command as often as any other one-syllable commands (cat, cp, mv, cd, ...)". The argument was nonsensical as it stood! |
How is |
Really? |
Okay well whatever, I think you're right about the vagueness of the name of the project. One would not assume that |
I agree that naming things is hard. I suggested "progress". Has anyone got a better idea? I think this bug should hang around for a bit, say 3 months, someone might come up with something better in the future. We don't have to decide right now. Hopefully the author will find one of the suggestions good! |
@SiggyF by which distributions? I think cv is a good name. One could easily name it whatever they want after building. |
I'm looking silently at this ticket since the beginning, and for my part, very pleased with the current name (short, pronounceable [see-vee], and close to the commands it monitors [see-pee, …]). But as you said, feel free to suggest better names, I'm not strictly against a rename. (how do you rename a GitHub project, BTW ? :) |
You can probably fork to a new repo and ask github to redirect from the old one to the new one. |
no need to, there is a rename option in the admin panel. |
the problem with a name like |
The |
I toss in a penny for "progress." It's pretty intuitive. Nice job on coding the thing. We've needed this for awhile. |
@kapouer You are right. |
I think i'll change the project name to "progress". Any issue with a specific Linux distribution ? |
Not exactly, but
|
I disagree, please don't come up with convoluted names for a command one uses once in a blue moon. You need tobe able to remember it and trying to figure out how exactly it has been mutilated will be frustrating. If "progress" were so hot it'd have been taken already. If something better comes in the future it can still supercede this program taking away its name. |
Ha sorry, once again i feel like i'm not at ease explaining that simple problem. |
It's better with a short name, I prefer to use an acronyme.
I already checked on debian/ubuntu and |
"progress" is not being used, being OCD about holding a chance open someone else might perhaps by chance want to use it in ten years can be done elsewhere than here, please. Your frequency list obviously does not apply here, the top 21 are not names of executable programs. Do not try to give your position weight by coming up with unrelated data thinking no one will question it. It's arrogant of you to say you are "explaining" a "simple problem" as if the others /just don't get it/ (those morons). Don't worry, they do, your argument just isn't a very good one. gpv and other acronyms will be difficult or impossible to memorize. This is not a tool most will use daily, which is necessary to memorize a made-up word like that. That's why even programming languages only ever use full words for their keywords - and the programmer repeats those dozens of times a day. Great to know this tool also works on non-coreutils programs. I forgot all about that. |
I disagree, command must keep a short name. I think Others proposition: |
I see your point but bear in mind this acronym means something /to you/. Presented with it.others.will not recognize it. "progress" is just one char more to type than "gpm" or "gpv". |
I didn't want to say the acronyme means something to me, but the meaning of the acronyme means something to me, and I hope it's the case for all. Just one char more ???
I didn't say I'm right or you are wrong, I just expose my opinion here, and I hope more people will do the same and we will see which option is more profitable for most peoples. |
Try gpv vs prog :) |
Oh, github broke my comment. Try gpv(space) vs prog(tab). There. |
Well, name "gpm" is already taken as "General Purpose Mouse interface". |
I'd like to add that a too generic name like "progress" has issues with finding information about it online. Search for "progress linux command" in a search-engine and you'll find dozens of information to different topics (currently 31.1m Google results). On the other hand you're more likely to find the right results for "prg linux command" (currently 510k Google results) or similar. Generality of the name can make diffusion of the product harder. |
I agree with @alexschomb that it should be somewhat unique for searchability sake. For what it's worth my vote is |
Hi, psio should logically display information about file input and output for all processes as specified. This command sorta fits this idea. But it also will make people assume compatibility with ps command line syntax - not sure if that can come. I guess it should probably also provide different columns to display other IO information - the amount of open files, (net) sockets, disk io, net io, totals transfered, etc (not all of those are easy). If @Xfennec is happy for the project to go in this direction (which means a lot of work from him) then I say psio is a good name. |
Err, i mean i searched for "bash (command) etc". I hate github on mobiles :( |
Thanks to @Xfennec for the utility, and please don't change the name. Whatever short name you choose will likely conflict with someone else's utility, and longer names are a pain to type/remember. |
I'm perfectly fine with |
psio looks like a nice name... does it stand for progress input output? |
I share @cheater's idea that Another thing is that I'm not ready to change the name of the whole project, it's too late. For instance, the GitHub URL is already spread around, some people know me as the "cv guy", etc. So my current idea is that the name This can be done by providing a way to choose the binary's name at compile time, for instance using a variable in the Makefile with a default "alternate name". Most packagers will then probably use this alternate name. In some way, it the case with tools like nc / netcat. Is this idea silly ? |
It's silly because of this: but even if repository redirects weren't available, it would still be a bad idea. The time from the creation of github.com/Xfennec/cv until now is insignificant in comparison to the whole lifetime of a project such as this. At some point it will be less than 1% of the project's lifetime, and a very insignificant 1% at that. Do not burden the other 99% with issues, history, additional complexity just for the sake of people who are used to how things were during that 1%. That's a very bad idea. Packagers will find their way around github. |
Whatever it's called, renaming it so it's not conflicting with other packages will allow users like me to install it on Debian/Ubuntu using the packaging repository instead of seeing this when wanting to quickly install and use it after searching for "cp progress" and being told about this cool tool: user@ubuntuserver:~$ cv I almost installed that before checking to see that Radiance is not the package I want, because the name conflicts. That is why the name must be changed, it conflicts with at least one other package, and if CV as a acronym doesn't even make sense, doesn't the name change makes sense anyway? Pick another name such cvp or cvprogress if you are really attached to cv (both names are available). I understand it's annoying to be asked to change the project name but changing it will let the tool get the exposure it should, on all distributions. 👍 |
Finally renamed the project |
I like it. Especially that we can run "watch progress ..." now. very intuitive! 👍 |
Thank you everyone. |
There is progress with "progress", but it's still too generic ! |
A year from now I het it will be one of the top hits for "progress bash command". |
@Xfennec Thank you ! |
@Xfennec do you plan to release a new version for a clean start for progress? |
@florianl and everyone else this is not the place for further discussion. This is not a forum. Please leave this bug report alone. |
Ironically, the reason why I remembered the name of this program was because of it's odd name. Now that it's Perhaps put "(previously cv)" or something similar in the description? |
Someone please lock this... |
cv, as much as it's an amazing short name, doesn't really relate to what the thing does. I wager a bet that most people won't use the command as any other one-syllable commands (cat, cp, mv, cd, ...) so a longer, more descriptive name would be more fitting. The first thought is "progress" but someone might have a better idea. Typing prog^I will be enough to run it at least on my system (which is a very non-special Ubuntu install)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: