Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Limited CPU architecture support in 2.0 #105

Closed
flekken opened this issue May 4, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Limited CPU architecture support in 2.0 #105

flekken opened this issue May 4, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
@shliama
Labels
enhancement help wanted

Comments

@flekken
Copy link

flekken commented May 4, 2016 •
edited

Why is only 3 architectures supported in 2.0?
Is there a reason?
For example, I cannot use the version 2.0 of this library in an x64 android emulator.
@flekken flekken changed the title Limited CPU architecture support Limited CPU architecture support in 2.0 May 4, 2016
@shliama
Copy link
Contributor

shliama commented May 4, 2016

Well, it's just most common setup :)
I can build it for all cpu but more .so files - more weight.
So, I don't think I need to include mips and mips64, but I can add x86_64 for you :octocat:

@shliama
Copy link
Contributor

shliama commented Jun 27, 2016

@flekken please try to use library version 2.1.0 - I've added x86_64 support.

@shliama shliama self-assigned this Jun 27, 2016
@ZinoKader
Copy link

I think this might have something to do with my issue as it touches CPU architectures and native libraries, but I don't possess the knowledge in those areas to pursue why myself. Have a look: #163

@flekken
Copy link
Author

flekken commented Aug 6, 2016

Just tried with the 2.1.1 version on the x86_64 emulator and It's working. Thank you!

@flekken flekken closed this as completed Aug 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@shliama shliama

Labels
enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@shliama @ZinoKader @flekken